<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jazzcollector.com &#187; Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jazzcollector.com/category/questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jazzcollector.com</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quickie Quiz</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/prestige/quickie-quiz-14/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/prestige/quickie-quiz-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prestige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m listening to an old Prestige LP now and I&#8217;m reading the liner notes and it talks about the artist having been an inspector of blueprints at a Sperry gyroscope factory. I may have known this at one time, but at this stage I&#8217;ve probably forgotten more than I remember. Anyone want to hazard a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m listening to an old Prestige LP now and I&#8217;m reading the liner notes and it talks about the artist having been an inspector of blueprints at a Sperry gyroscope factory. I may have known this at one time, but at this stage I&#8217;ve probably forgotten more than I remember. Anyone want to hazard a guess as to who this is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/prestige/quickie-quiz-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorite Jazz Ballad Vocal Performances?</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/favorite-jazz-ballad-vocal-performances/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/favorite-jazz-ballad-vocal-performances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clifford Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emarcy Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Vaughan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sitting on the porch at my lakehouse with the lovely Mrs. JC yesterday afternoon and we were listing to a playlist I had made for my iPod of various ballad performances. Yes, I do have an iPod and other various digital devices and I do not only listen to music playing on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jazzcollector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sarah-vaughan.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3162" title="sarah vaughan" src="http://jazzcollector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sarah-vaughan.jpg" alt="" width="352" height="348" /></a>I was sitting on the porch at my lakehouse with the lovely Mrs. JC yesterday afternoon and we were listing to a playlist I had made for my iPod of various ballad performances. Yes, I do have an iPod and other various digital devices and I do not only listen to music playing on a turntable, although that is always the preferred method when available. Anyway, as we were listening, one of the tracks was &#8220;Jim&#8221; from the Sarah Vaughan album with Clifford Brown, Emarcy 36004. I mentioned quite randomly that many jazz fans and jazz collectors consider this track to be one of the greatest jazz vocal ballad performances of all time. I&#8217;m not sure where I came up with that information, but it was definitely lodged in my brain somewhere: Perhaps there was a vote somewhere, or perhaps it had just come up in late night discussion over a few beverages. Anyway, I thought it might be an interesting topic for a lazy weekday afternoon in August, so I&#8217;m throwing it out there for the Jazz Collector community. Favorite jazz ballad vocal performances. Okay, go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/favorite-jazz-ballad-vocal-performances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Makes a Collectible a Collectible?</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/features/what-makes-a-collectible-a-collectible/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/features/what-makes-a-collectible-a-collectible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz Vinyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another post (A Visit To A Record Store, Part 2), Jan poses an interesting question, addressed to experienced and serious collectors: What do you consider to be collectible and how do you decide if a second pressing of a record is collectible or not? I am not, I must admit, among the most serious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another post <strong><a title="Jazz Collector" href="http://jazzcollector.com/prestige/a-visit-to-a-record-store-part-2/#comment-14438" target="_blank">(A Visit To A Record Store, Part 2)</a></strong>, Jan poses an interesting question, addressed to experienced and serious collectors: What do you consider to be collectible and how do you decide if a second pressing of a record is collectible or not?</p>
<p>I am not, I must admit, among the most serious of collectors. I know this sounds odd coming from the guy who writes about jazz records every day, pores over eBay listings to decide which records to put in the Price Guide and writes articles under the headline &#8220;Confessions of a Vinyl Addict.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, and this gets to Jan&#8217;s point: The copy of Saxophone Colossus in my collection is a Bergenfield, N.J. pressing. Same with Tenor Madness. I have the Bergenfield copies, they are in great condition, they have yellow labels, this is enough for me. I have the music in an early pressing, it sounds great, I&#8217;m OK. Would I like a New York pressing of both of these records? Yes. Would I ever obsess about it? No. Would I ever pay the going rate on eBay for them? Not a chance.</p>
<p>The people I&#8217;ve always considered to be &#8220;serious collectors&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t accept these second pressings and are constantly hunting for the original pressings and would not be content with anything but an original. I do think, however, things are changing and the</p>
<p><span id="more-2661"></span>characteristics of what people might consider to be a &#8220;collectible&#8221; record are expanding. I say this because we&#8217;re seeing it happen every day on eBay. Later Blue Notes and Prestiges, in particular, are selling for several hundred dollars, which, to me, is definitely a collectible price. In my view, a Bergenfield copy of Saxophone Colossus is a fine collectible. I&#8217;m proud to have it in my collection and I do believe it will go up in value rather than down in value.</p>
<p>The other point I&#8217;d like to make about this is that it&#8217;s still about the music. I&#8217;d rather have a second pressing or third pressing or Japanese reissue of music I love, rather than an original pressing of music that doesn&#8217;t move me. But that&#8217;s me. What about you other &#8220;experienced&#8221; and &#8220;serious&#8221; collectors out there? How would you respond to Jan&#8217;s question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/features/what-makes-a-collectible-a-collectible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant Steps, Black Label, No DG?</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coltrane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick question from a reader: A black label pressing of John Coltrane Giant Steps, Atlantic 1311, with no deep groove. Black label, mono, no DG. If it&#8217;s not an original pressing, what is it? I&#8217;m not asking this as a quiz: I&#8217;m asking to find the answer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question from a reader: A black label pressing of <strong>John Coltrane Giant Steps, Atlantic 1311,</strong> with no deep groove. Black label, mono, no DG. If it&#8217;s not an original pressing, what is it? I&#8217;m not asking this as a quiz: I&#8217;m asking to find the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Blue Note: Another Exception</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-blue-note-another-exception/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-blue-note-another-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blue Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collecting Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz Record Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Shorter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blue Note information provided by Larry Cohn has been invaluable and yet, it seems, there is always more to learn. We noticed this tidbit in a posting by Fred Cohen at the Jazz Record Center, which has a new auction on eBay this week: Wayne Shorter, Adams Apple, Blue Note 8232. This is listed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blue Note information provided by Larry Cohn has been invaluable and yet, it seems, there is always more to learn. We noticed this tidbit in a posting by Fred Cohen at the <strong><a title="Jazz Record Center" href="http://www.jazzrecordcenter.com/" target="_blank">Jazz Record Center,</a></strong> which has a new auction on eBay this week: <strong><a title="Wayne Shorter Jazz Vinyl" href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Wayne-Shorter-on-Blue-Note_W0QQitemZ290386364824QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMusic_on_Vinyl?hash=item439c604998" target="_blank">Wayne Shorter, Adams Apple, Blue Note 8232.</a></strong> This is listed as an original mono pressing with the <em>Liberty</em> label. Under normal circumstances you would expect this to be a New York USA label, based on the catalogue number. However, Fred points out</p>
<p><span id="more-2485"></span>that this LP was issued late and there are no pressings with the New York address. So it is one more exception to the rule. If you click on this item, you should also look at the other items on eBay this week from <strong>Jazz Record Center. </strong>They always post interesting items and they are also a good gauge of the overall market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-blue-note-another-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Note Deep Groove: All You Need To Know</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-deep-groove-all-you-need-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-deep-groove-all-you-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blue Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collecting Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Note Records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week one of our readers asked about deep grooves and flat edges. Another reader reached out to the Blue Note expert Larry Cohn for the answers. Last week we posted the answer about the Blue Note flat edge LPs. Here is Larry&#8217;s response on the deep groove. Thanks to Larry for being so generous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="ecxMsoNormal">Last week one of our readers asked about deep grooves and flat edges. Another reader reached out to the Blue Note expert Larry Cohn for the answers. Last week we posted the answer about the <strong><a title="Blue Note Jazz Vinyl Flat Edge" href="http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-flat-edge-all-you-need-to-know/" target="_blank">Blue Note flat edge LPs.</a></strong> Here is Larry&#8217;s response on the deep groove. Thanks to Larry for being so generous with the information and to Don-Lucky for reaching out.</p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal">&#8220;Put simply, there were special dies attached to the pressing machine, that held down the <span class="ecxecxspelle">stampers</span> for Side A and Side B during manufacturing.  These dies traditionally cut the deep groove into the label during a pressing.  In 1961 new dies were created that were more streamlined, holding down the <span class="ecxecxspelle">stampers</span> in place but putting the mere slight indentation into the label – what we see on modern pressings and call NO DG.</p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal">
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>&#8220;These parts were interchangeable and compatible with the machines, so for the period</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span><span id="more-2480"></span>1961 to 1965 the one side-DG pressings occurred when an old, obsolete die was used on one side of the record and one of the new dies was used on the other side.  Similarly, we find late pressings that are DG, such as Night of the Cookers, caused by using leftover old dies. By 1966 when pressings were shifted entirely to the three Liberty national plants there were only NO DG disks because Liberty did not use any of the old, obsolete dies.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal">
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>&#8220;The important thing here is to realize that it is merely a function of a small, accessory part and has nothing to do with the <span class="ecxecxspelle">stampers</span> or the pressing machines themselves. I often run into self-appointed experts who have built up a whole mythology about the relationship of the DG to the grooves, sound, etc., but it is merely an identifier caused by the use of these specific dies, mere attachments in the process that literally leave their mark on the finished disk.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal">
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>&#8220;I had Bob Porter, the DJ/producer who has always lived in New Jersey, do some research for me on the <span class="ecxecxspelle">Plastylite</span> subject about ten years ago, and  he found a Russian-speaking contact who knew nothing about the history of the company he apparently inherited, but as far as I know they are long gone.  Blue Notes recently (say a Bird &amp; the Bee or Al Green vinyl LP) are pressed by Caroline Distribution, a local company and of course RTI handles the mastering and pressings on the West Coast for the various competing reissue companies licensing Blue Note. </span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>&#8220;The very cheap, low-quality issues you see in the marketplace, identifiable by the 304 Park Ave. South address on labels and jacket slicks, are produced by a New Jersey <span class="ecxecxspelle">company</span> named Scorpio Music. In my Blue Note research I accumulate as many <span class="ecxecxspelle">Plastylite</span> pressings as possible, often grabbing the defective or Poor quality copies other people eschew, and am still busy working on my own book – which documents all the identifiers of individual <span class="ecxecxspelle">stampers</span> by locating and describing the P in the runoff (its shape, and orientation relative to the constant Catalog Matrix No. from the Master) for each disk – a unique signature left by each individual A &amp; B <span class="ecxecxspelle">stamper</span> in existence.  In the last two or three years I only rarely come across new (to me), unknown <span class="ecxecxspelle">stampers</span>, so I’m over the hump on that project.&#8221;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-deep-groove-all-you-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Note Flat Edge: All You Need To Know</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-flat-edge-all-you-need-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-flat-edge-all-you-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blue Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collecting Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have the full, complete, unassailable answer to all questions about Blue Note and the flat edge, thanks to the Blue Note expert Larry Cohn and Don-Lucky for reaching out to Larry. We will also be posting Larry&#8217;s comments on the deep groove as well. Here&#8217;s the information on the flat edge: &#8220;Here’s some information [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have the full, complete, unassailable answer to all questions about Blue Note and the flat edge, thanks to the Blue Note expert Larry Cohn and Don-Lucky for reaching out to Larry. We will also be posting Larry&#8217;s comments on the deep groove as well. Here&#8217;s the information on the flat edge:</p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>&#8220;Here’s some information on the Edges/Rims. The change from Flat Rim (aka Flat Edge) to Safety Lip occurred in 1957.<span> </span>It was in response to new industry standards, occasioned by the popularity of automatic changers, whereby disks were routinely stacked and would fall on each other, the way we recall handling 45rpm disks. To lessen the damage to the LPs, the Safety Lip, also called a Groove Guard by one of the companies, was created at the edge of each side of the disk to keep the actual surfaces of the two disks from touching each other when they came into horizontal contact. It also protected the needle, since</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span><span id="more-2464"></span>on a flat edge disk the needle can slip off the edge and drop down, hitting the platen when it is in Automatic turntable mode (you have to be a <span class="ecxSpellE">clutz</span> to do this placing the needle at the beginning of the record manually!).</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>For Blue Note the changeover occurred during the 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 label era.<span> </span>ALL of the original Lexington releases were flat edge, both for the 1500 and the 1200 series, but the latter 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 albums were pressed and released after the switch to Safety Lip <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span>, so they only exist in that format. I will get to the catalogue numbers in a minute.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>What I discovered in my research was a very significant fact (which<span> </span>can be quickly verified by any collector by checking his collection of 1955-1958 era Blue Notes): The <span class="ecxSpellE">stamper</span> itself causes the flat edge to occur on a disk, and likewise the Safety Lip, not some attachment or function of the press.<span> </span>So when Blue Note switched to Safety Lips they had to create all new <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> – both for repressing/reissues and for new releases.<span> </span>My &#8216;eureka&#8217; moment for discovering this is when I compared the Runoff vinyl identification for each disk and found that NO flat edge Blue Note bears the same Runoff id of its <span class="ecxSpellE">stamper</span> (namely the unique shape and positioning of the <span class="ecxSpellE">stamper’s</span> inscribed P (for <span class="ecxSpellE">Plastylite</span>) as a safety lip Blue Note of the same title!<span> </span>They are always different – new <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> had to be ordered for any safety lip pressing.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>The catch is that the Old <span class="ecxSpellE">Stampers</span> (flat rim <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span>) for various titles were not thrown away immediately, but retained for a few months –then all were discarded.<span> </span>I ascertained this by correlating the various characteristics for each title to see what exists and what never existed, e.g., there is no such thing as a Blue Note flat edge disk with an R or INC on the label (characteristics introduced in 1959 after the label incorporated).<span> </span>Stereo was not introduced until 1959 so by definition no flat edge stereos exist at all. But within the mono sphere, it is impossible to find a NEW YORK USA disk with flat edge, or an INC 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC inscribed label with flat edge.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>The timing of the changeover is (approximately) as follows:</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoListParagraph"><span><span>(1)<span> </span></span></span><span>November 1955: 12” LPs were introduced by BN, using the old 767 Lexington Ave. blank foreground labels previously used for 10” LPs.<span> </span>All pressings flat edge. No more 10” LPs in the U.S., although later reissues in that obsolete format for European sales were made.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoListParagraph"><span><span>(2)<span> </span></span></span><span>January 1957: 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 labels were first printed, and flat edge disks pressed with them. <span> </span>Already preprinted Lexington labels (for previously released older titles) were kept in stock and available for 2<sup>nd</sup> pressings –retained indefinitely (Lexington labels appear even on some Liberty (no P) pressings 10 years after being printed for this reason).</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoListParagraph"><span><span>(3)<span> </span></span></span><span>July 1957: Safety Lip <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> created, first used for the release of BLP 1562 (Horace) and BLP 1561 (<span class="ecxSpellE">Sabu</span>). That same month the previously manufactured Lee Morgan 1557 was also released to the stores but it was still FLAT RIM, the final <span> </span>flat disk issued by Blue Note.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoListParagraph"><span><span>(4)<span> </span></span></span><span>August 1957: The newly redesigned labels, inscribed 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC, are introduced, first used for the release of Curtis Fuller 1567.<span> </span>As in #3 above, there was a coexistence with the old 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 label based on when a title was PREPARED for release as opposed to its ACTUAL debut in the stores. NO 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC label was ever used for a flat edge first pressing, though many show up on flat edge 2<sup>nd</sup> pressings.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoListParagraph"><span><span>(5)<span> </span></span></span><span>By mid-1958: No more flat edge disks were pressed, even for reissues/late pressings.<span> </span>All new releases had been Safety Lip disks since 8/57, but many older titles continued to be pressed and sold using the leftover Flat Edge <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> for their manufacture.<span> </span>At some point in 1958 these Flat Edge <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> were discarded.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>The claim in #5 is established by inference.<span> </span>I looked through all the anomalies and they are mainly identifiable by FLAT EDGE DISKS bearing the 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC label.<span> </span>No original Blue Note first pressing was ever released in this format, combining 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC label on a flat edge disk.<span> </span>All such specimens occurred by using the in-stock flat edge <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> for an older title, but combining that with a newly-printed 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC label for that title –for popular records the need to replenish the labels was there. Among the many examples of these odd birds are notably the Monk LPs 1510 and 1511, both of which exist 63<sup>rd</sup> NYC flat edge. Others in this category include 1201, 1504, 1512, 1514, 1518, 1521, 1531, 1539, 1540, 1542<span> </span>(all of these were issued originally as <span class="ecxSpellE">Lex</span>, years before), plus 1544, 1548 and 1554 (63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 originals).</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span> Every Lexington Blue Note, ranging from 1201-1205 and 1501-1543, was initially issued flat edge. <span> </span>Any Lexington seen with a safety lip is automatically a second pressing. Many of these titles (the more popular ones) were reissued as <span class="ecxSpellE">Lexingtons</span> with safety lips using the new <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> created in 1958 and 1959.<span> </span>Had Blue Note (ever-frugal) retained the old <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> indefinitely, then such Lexington safety lip beasts would be few and far between, since recurring demand for new pressings would have been satisfied using the old <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span>. By the time new <span class="ecxSpellE">stampers</span> would be required the Lexington labels would have been used up.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>I’ve already listed all the catalog numbers issued <span class="ecxSpellE">Lex</span> flat rim. The 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK USA flat rim original first pressings are: 1544-1550, 1554 and 1557.<span> </span>There are other 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK 23 flat disks that are 2<sup>nd</sup> pressings (following <span class="ecxSpellE">Lex</span> originals) such as the familiar 1502, 1503 and 1534.</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>The 63<sup>rd</sup> NEW YORK safety lip original first pressings are: 1551-1552, 1555-1556, 1558-1559, 1561-1563, 1565, 1575-1576 and the anomalies 1568 and 1577 which were issued with that label on one side only (!).</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span>To understand these strange patterns you have to note carefully the step-by-step process of each record going from recording session to final release to stores, with various delays along the way causing the discrepancies.<span> </span>This was especially the case with most Volume 2 records –often unreleased for a year or two after the Volume 1 came out, but assigned a catalog number consecutive with Volume 1 and given initial preparation (mastering, design) back with #1.<span> </span>Delayed release of 1516 caused it to have its cover constructed in a new fashion, not matching its peers’ covers (much to the consternation of Japanese collectors). <span> </span>Put simply, jacket for 1516 looks like the jacket of 1546, NOT its close-by numbered brethren –it lacks the <span class="ecxSpellE">Gakubuchi</span> frame lines across the top and spine on front. <span> </span>Delay of 1597’s release caused all the disks to be made without the dg, which was no longer the norm when it finally debuted to stores in October 1961 (when Midnight Special 4078 debuted), more than 3 years after the release of 1596. Its first pressing back in 1958 BEFORE it was shelved comprises only a handful of copies.<span> </span>Such delays occurred right through the Liberty era, causing the odd look and characteristics of many albums such as Andrew!!! 84203 and <span class="ecxSpellE">Delightfulee, Lee</span> Morgan 4243 &amp; 84243.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/blue-note-flat-edge-all-you-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Reader Question Re: Deep Groove, Flat Edge</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/a-reader-question-re-deep-groove-flat-edge/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/a-reader-question-re-deep-groove-flat-edge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Groove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I haven&#8217;t posted in a couple of days. Was stuck in a snowstorm without my computer. It was like being cut off from civilization. Anyway, I&#8217;m back and will soon get caught up on all I&#8217;ve missed in the Jazz Collector world. In the meantime, one of our readers posts a question for our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I haven&#8217;t posted in a couple of days. Was stuck in a snowstorm without my computer. It was like being cut off from civilization. Anyway, I&#8217;m back and will soon get caught up on all I&#8217;ve missed in the Jazz Collector world. In the meantime, one of our readers posts a question for our readers: <strong>What is the derivation of the deep groove and the flat edge?</strong> Where they technical considerations that were later abandoned as the technology shifted? Were they specific to certain labels and pressing factories? It&#8217;s a good question and I&#8217;m sure searching deep on Google may provide an answer, but perhaps we can provide a shortcut and fodder for interesting conversation by asking it here. So, to all, whither the deep groove and the flat edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/a-reader-question-re-deep-groove-flat-edge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Esoteric Question Of The Day: Does This LP Have RVG?</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/1000-records/esoteric-question-of-the-day-does-this-lp-have-rvg/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/1000-records/esoteric-question-of-the-day-does-this-lp-have-rvg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$1000 Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz Vinyl Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Lib Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie McLean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duonri reminded me that I didn&#8217;t include this record from Nautiluso in the list: Jackie McLean, The New Tradition, Ad Lib 6601. This was listed in M- condition and wound up selling for $4,036, the highest price we&#8217;ve ever recorded for a jazz record on the Jazz Collector Price Guide. So I went back to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jazzcollector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jackiejpeg.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2348" title="Jackie McLean Jazz Vinyl" src="http://jazzcollector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jackiejpeg-300x298.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="298" /></a>Duonri reminded me that I didn&#8217;t include this record from Nautiluso in the list: <strong><a title="Jackie McLean Jazz vinyl" href="http://cgi.ebay.com/AD-LIB-6601-JACKIE-McLEAN-New-Tradition-1st-Nm_W0QQitemZ300353637081QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMusic_on_Vinyl?hash=item45ee78cad9&amp;_trksid=p3911.c0.m14#ht_1491wt_1067" target="_blank">Jackie McLean, The New Tradition, Ad Lib 6601.</a></strong> This was listed in M- condition and wound up selling for $4,036, the highest price we&#8217;ve ever recorded for a jazz record on the<strong><a title="Jazz Collector Price Guide" href="http://jazzcollector.com/price-guides/" target="_blank"> Jazz Collector Price Guide</a>. </strong>So I went back to the original listing in order to record it, and I noticed something I hadn&#8217;t noticed before: The seller says this one has the RVG in the deadwax? The question I ask: Is this possible &#8212; does an original pressing of The New Tradition have the RVG in the deadwax, or did he just make that up? I would have looked in my own collection for the answer but, unfortunately, I sold my copy of The New Tradition for a mere $400 nearly 20 years ago. Many of you may have heard this story before, but I sold a bunch of my rarest records in one shot so I could buy a boat. Six months later</p>
<p><span id="more-2347"></span>the boat sank. The records, I&#8217;m sure, are alive and well and sitting on some happy collectors&#8217; shelves in Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/1000-records/esoteric-question-of-the-day-does-this-lp-have-rvg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sidemen Deluxe: Phil Ffunque &amp; Jimmy O&#8217;Heigho</title>
		<link>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/sidemen-deluxe-phil-ffunque-jimmy-oheigho/</link>
		<comments>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/sidemen-deluxe-phil-ffunque-jimmy-oheigho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Newman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just posting an old Joe Newman RCA album on eBay and came across the following pseudonyms: Phil Ffunque on alto and Jimmy O&#8217;Heigho on trombone. Pretty easy to figure out, but I won&#8217;t spoil the fun. My favorite is still Buckshot La Funke from Here Comes Louis Smith, Blue Note 1584.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just posting an old <strong>Joe Newman</strong> RCA album on eBay and came across the following pseudonyms: Phil Ffunque on alto and Jimmy O&#8217;Heigho on trombone. Pretty easy to figure out, but I won&#8217;t spoil the fun. My favorite is still Buckshot La Funke from <strong>Here Comes Louis Smith, Blue Note 1584. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jazzcollector.com/questions/sidemen-deluxe-phil-ffunque-jimmy-oheigho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

