<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: DG, or Not DG	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stefano		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-440144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-440144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Talking about deep groove labels, please I need your assistance: I noticed in my collection that some  Columbia 6 eyes records (Davis KOB, Mingus ah um etc.) do not have deep grooves labels but they have 1A or 1B codes in trail off. In your opinion, these records are later pressings or maybe they were produced in different record plants? Thank you for your answer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about deep groove labels, please I need your assistance: I noticed in my collection that some  Columbia 6 eyes records (Davis KOB, Mingus ah um etc.) do not have deep grooves labels but they have 1A or 1B codes in trail off. In your opinion, these records are later pressings or maybe they were produced in different record plants? Thank you for your answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill W.		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-440105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-440105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The phrase &quot;given it&#039;s age&quot; is usually bad news. Age has NOTHING to do with a grade. Any lp graded &quot;EX given it&#039;s age&quot; I immediately assume is one full grade lower at least. It also tells me that the seller doesn&#039;t understand how grading works.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase &#8220;given it&#8217;s age&#8221; is usually bad news. Age has NOTHING to do with a grade. Any lp graded &#8220;EX given it&#8217;s age&#8221; I immediately assume is one full grade lower at least. It also tells me that the seller doesn&#8217;t understand how grading works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Allen		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-440104</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-440104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[looks like that Hancock link also goes to the Dolphy...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like that Hancock link also goes to the Dolphy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sidewinder		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-440019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sidewinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-440019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a NY mono Sidewinder copy which has a blank label on one side !  They were obviously manning all of the pumps when that one was created.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a NY mono Sidewinder copy which has a blank label on one side !  They were obviously manning all of the pumps when that one was created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gregory The Fish		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-440008</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory The Fish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-440008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mark, mine does not have any DG. but, like you, i do not worry too much by that era about DG, especially for a record like sidewinder, where they probably had every press firing on all cylinders to meet demand!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark, mine does not have any DG. but, like you, i do not worry too much by that era about DG, especially for a record like sidewinder, where they probably had every press firing on all cylinders to meet demand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-439958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 05:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-439958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get worked up about deep grooves or non-deep grooves on New York USA Blue Notes.  I feel it&#039;s more of an issue for 47 w 63rd pressings.  My mono copy of &quot;the sidewinder&quot; has a deep groove on both sides - go figure!?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get worked up about deep grooves or non-deep grooves on New York USA Blue Notes.  I feel it&#8217;s more of an issue for 47 w 63rd pressings.  My mono copy of &#8220;the sidewinder&#8221; has a deep groove on both sides &#8211; go figure!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joaquim		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-439955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joaquim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 04:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-439955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With a mono cartridge the noise of these 50s pressings is reduced significantly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a mono cartridge the noise of these 50s pressings is reduced significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Abrasive_Beautiful		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-439933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abrasive_Beautiful]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-439933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m seeing quite a lot of little micro scuffs from stacking around the edges of that Informal Jazz. Would expect a bit of crackle at the start of that one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m seeing quite a lot of little micro scuffs from stacking around the edges of that Informal Jazz. Would expect a bit of crackle at the start of that one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/dg-or-not-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-439927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=7248#comment-439927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well-lit photos on the playing surface of that Informal Jazz reveal some pretty visible nicks -- I would assume it&#039;s around a VG for the record. Glad to see you back, Al!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well-lit photos on the playing surface of that Informal Jazz reveal some pretty visible nicks &#8212; I would assume it&#8217;s around a VG for the record. Glad to see you back, Al!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
