<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: High Priced Vinyl? &#8216;Tis in the Eye of the Beholder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 07:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: x.10		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-417240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[x.10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 07:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-417240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The results of the Paris auction are available. 

See the Blue Notes here: http://www.ferri-drouot.com/html/index.jsp?r=blue+note&#038;Submit=OK&#038;id=22909&#038;npp=100&#038;lng=fr&#038;aff=5&#038;ordre=1&#038;np=1&#038;recherche=true

It seems some records would have reached higher prices if sold on Ebay.
Any comments on those prices?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of the Paris auction are available. </p>
<p>See the Blue Notes here: <a href="http://www.ferri-drouot.com/html/index.jsp?r=blue+note&#038;Submit=OK&#038;id=22909&#038;npp=100&#038;lng=fr&#038;aff=5&#038;ordre=1&#038;np=1&#038;recherche=true" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ferri-drouot.com/html/index.jsp?r=blue+note&#038;Submit=OK&#038;id=22909&#038;npp=100&#038;lng=fr&#038;aff=5&#038;ordre=1&#038;np=1&#038;recherche=true</a></p>
<p>It seems some records would have reached higher prices if sold on Ebay.<br />
Any comments on those prices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fredrik		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-400042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fredrik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-400042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The PRLP 7007 is probably a 3rd pressing, as the 1st pressing should have the &quot;Non Breakable High Fidelity&quot; on the label, the 2nd has the HI FI on the label and the 3rd pressing the HIGH FIDELITY like this one has. As mentioned, the cover is not the 1st art jacket.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PRLP 7007 is probably a 3rd pressing, as the 1st pressing should have the &#8220;Non Breakable High Fidelity&#8221; on the label, the 2nd has the HI FI on the label and the 3rd pressing the HIGH FIDELITY like this one has. As mentioned, the cover is not the 1st art jacket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david j		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-400019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david j]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-400019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[undercurrent was issued w/ a dg on one side only, although there is some debate if there is a true first press of this record since some no dg copies have been found with promo stamps, at least according to cohen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>undercurrent was issued w/ a dg on one side only, although there is some debate if there is a true first press of this record since some no dg copies have been found with promo stamps, at least according to cohen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david j		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-400018</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david j]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-400018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the miles 7007 is a second press. the first press should have a 446 address.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the miles 7007 is a second press. the first press should have a 446 address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-399986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 23:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-399986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That Miles Davis, The Musings of Miles, Prestige 7007 was not an original pressing as it has ads for later records on the back cover.  Also that Eric Dolphy at the Five Spot, Volume 1, Prestige New Jazz 8260 wasn&#039;t a deep groove as listed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Miles Davis, The Musings of Miles, Prestige 7007 was not an original pressing as it has ads for later records on the back cover.  Also that Eric Dolphy at the Five Spot, Volume 1, Prestige New Jazz 8260 wasn&#8217;t a deep groove as listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Allen		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-399985</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-399985</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Dorham is rare but not on a desirable (to some) label. For me, the small-label or private press records are more intriguing... but I don&#039;t have $2,000 to spend on an LP!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dorham is rare but not on a desirable (to some) label. For me, the small-label or private press records are more intriguing&#8230; but I don&#8217;t have $2,000 to spend on an LP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ceedee		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/high-priced-vinyl-tis-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/comment-page-1/#comment-399983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ceedee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6817#comment-399983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Al,as you can see when you double check your link,Relaxing sold for $373,not $97. Most folks I know view hundreds-or thousands- of dollars spent in pursuit of rare lps a luxury. I regrettably must concur. When I sell &quot;high&quot;,but then find it near impossible to replace the lp at a reasonable cost,I wonder if it&#039;s just inevitable or whether I&#039;m contributing to my own grief( insert sob here).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al,as you can see when you double check your link,Relaxing sold for $373,not $97. Most folks I know view hundreds-or thousands- of dollars spent in pursuit of rare lps a luxury. I regrettably must concur. When I sell &#8220;high&#8221;,but then find it near impossible to replace the lp at a reasonable cost,I wonder if it&#8217;s just inevitable or whether I&#8217;m contributing to my own grief( insert sob here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
