<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More Jazz Vinyl For the $2,000 Bin	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Canals		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/comment-page-1/#comment-32545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Canals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3164#comment-32545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear All,

I just received in the mail a copy of the newly re-mastered RVG series Hank Mobley Blue Note 1550. It even contains two alternate takes not included in the original Lp. Why pay $2,142??
My love of Lps does not go that far ..... neither does my budget!

Paul]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear All,</p>
<p>I just received in the mail a copy of the newly re-mastered RVG series Hank Mobley Blue Note 1550. It even contains two alternate takes not included in the original Lp. Why pay $2,142??<br />
My love of Lps does not go that far &#8230;.. neither does my budget!</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CK		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/comment-page-1/#comment-30872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3164#comment-30872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I checked my two copies. One of them marked &#039;for promotion&#039; with the NY23 address and yes it is a flat edge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked my two copies. One of them marked &#8216;for promotion&#8217; with the NY23 address and yes it is a flat edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: maarten kools		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/comment-page-1/#comment-30076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maarten kools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3164#comment-30076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i can only see 1 flat edge  on popsike, and it sold for around $1000. All the others have no mention of flat edge.... are we shure it should have one....??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can only see 1 flat edge  on popsike, and it sold for around $1000. All the others have no mention of flat edge&#8230;. are we shure it should have one&#8230;.??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dottorjazz		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/more-jazz-vinyl-for-the-2000-bin/comment-page-1/#comment-29974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dottorjazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=3164#comment-29974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[back on the same old question:as I wrote before this Mobley looked very desirable.I noticed the seller omitted info about flat edge,so I asked him:
Dear wax33,
hi,
flat edge?
thanks
- dottorjazz
Dear dottorjazz,
hi,
No.
Cordially,
-wax33
This info wasn&#039;t added at the bottom of the description,where it should have been.
this copy,beautiful under most aspects,is not an original first pressing.
The seller,which I know personally,declared:
 ORIGINAL 1ST PRESSING: YES
maybe I&#039;m wrong,but I wouldn&#039;t bet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>back on the same old question:as I wrote before this Mobley looked very desirable.I noticed the seller omitted info about flat edge,so I asked him:<br />
Dear wax33,<br />
hi,<br />
flat edge?<br />
thanks<br />
&#8211; dottorjazz<br />
Dear dottorjazz,<br />
hi,<br />
No.<br />
Cordially,<br />
-wax33<br />
This info wasn&#8217;t added at the bottom of the description,where it should have been.<br />
this copy,beautiful under most aspects,is not an original first pressing.<br />
The seller,which I know personally,declared:<br />
 ORIGINAL 1ST PRESSING: YES<br />
maybe I&#8217;m wrong,but I wouldn&#8217;t bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
