<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nice Records, Very Nice Condition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Al		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To Bob. Yes, that was my point. It would have been nice if they had pointed this out on the broadcast. Sorry if I was being a bit presumptive, just assumed the JC audience knew that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Bob. Yes, that was my point. It would have been nice if they had pointed this out on the broadcast. Sorry if I was being a bit presumptive, just assumed the JC audience knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bob miller		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[a note on the Brubeck giveaway. Brubeck did not write Take Five, Desmond did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a note on the Brubeck giveaway. Brubeck did not write Take Five, Desmond did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Peoples		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Peoples]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry, my error, the lighting made it look like a one sided DG on my computer. Am still wondering about the 61st covers &#038; when they were first introduced if anyone has any knowledge on this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, my error, the lighting made it look like a one sided DG on my computer. Am still wondering about the 61st covers &amp; when they were first introduced if anyone has any knowledge on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michel		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Euclid just sold a Lou Donaldson ‘Time is Right’ that had a one sided DG &#038; a 61st cover for 810$&quot;. 

This is the quote of Micheal People : if it was ONE SIDED as he describes, it wan not an original. If it was TWO sides DG, yes it was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Euclid just sold a Lou Donaldson ‘Time is Right’ that had a one sided DG &amp; a 61st cover for 810$&#8221;. </p>
<p>This is the quote of Micheal People : if it was ONE SIDED as he describes, it wan not an original. If it was TWO sides DG, yes it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Lou Donaldson that Euclid sold for $810 was DG both sides, 47 West 63rd labels, ear etched and r on the bottom: is it not an original?  I thought those were the attributes of an original from that period.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lou Donaldson that Euclid sold for $810 was DG both sides, 47 West 63rd labels, ear etched and r on the bottom: is it not an original?  I thought those were the attributes of an original from that period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michel		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well this Lou Donaldson was not a first... but it was from Euclirecords...
I don&#039;t know when the one sided DG reissue started. I know that Bobby Hutcherson&#039;s Dialogue was reissued with DG one side...Maybe Lary Cohn is around and will answer all those question, and probably more...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this Lou Donaldson was not a first&#8230; but it was from Euclirecords&#8230;<br />
I don&#8217;t know when the one sided DG reissue started. I know that Bobby Hutcherson&#8217;s Dialogue was reissued with DG one side&#8230;Maybe Lary Cohn is around and will answer all those question, and probably more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Peoples		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13183</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Peoples]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you have any idea when they started the one sided DG for reissues? I checked a few of mine &#038; I have a &#039;Sounds of Jimmy Smith&#039; with this one sided DG with a inner sleeve from 1965. I checked my &#039;Out to Lunch&#039; &#038; it is flat on both sides &#038; the corresponding BNs both are flat. Euclid just sold a Lou Donaldson &#039;Time is Right&#039; that had a one sided DG &#038; a 61st cover for 810$. Any idea when they switched to 61st covers? Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any idea when they started the one sided DG for reissues? I checked a few of mine &amp; I have a &#8216;Sounds of Jimmy Smith&#8217; with this one sided DG with a inner sleeve from 1965. I checked my &#8216;Out to Lunch&#8217; &amp; it is flat on both sides &amp; the corresponding BNs both are flat. Euclid just sold a Lou Donaldson &#8216;Time is Right&#8217; that had a one sided DG &amp; a 61st cover for 810$. Any idea when they switched to 61st covers? Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michel		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First press would be no Deep Groove !!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First press would be no Deep Groove !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blipp		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blipp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting information, Michel.  So what would a first pressing of OUT TO LUNCH be?  Deep-groove on both sides, or on neither?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting information, Michel.  So what would a first pressing of OUT TO LUNCH be?  Deep-groove on both sides, or on neither?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michel		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/nice-records-very-nice-condition/comment-page-1/#comment-13170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2547#comment-13170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Blue Note was using older stamp machines (with DG)  to repress some titles. In this case, DG on one side does not significate first pressing. But the highest bidder will probably not even know and not even care...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Note was using older stamp machines (with DG)  to repress some titles. In this case, DG on one side does not significate first pressing. But the highest bidder will probably not even know and not even care&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
