Comments on: On Ebay: Lou, Lou & Some Wailers

By: dottorjazz

dottorjazz — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:25:48 +0000

later info for 1591 (page bottom)
Questions and answers about this item
Q: Hello Is there R mark(trade mark) on bottom of both label? Is there “ear” mark on dead wax? Best
A: Here is my assessment of the record: (1) deep groove on both sides (2) definite “ear” on one side (3) half of “ear” on the other — Is that your “R”?
Sep 10, 2010
1537:further info useless,and in fact there were none.

By: Katharsis

Katharsis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:37:01 +0000

I’m confused right now, because when I look at the 1537 record, I can see all the details. But there is no evidence, that the seller put on the information later. So what’s it all about? Do you see the same?

By: maarten kools

maarten kools — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:01:26 +0000

1537: i could never afford a price like this, but this buyer must be unbelievably happy (im talking sniffin’ it, talking to it and even caressing it.. (i say: In a really heavy mood Crying to it!)…) …this one looks like NEW. One of the most beautifull covers of reid miles. Should have gotten more R.

By: maarten kools

maarten kools — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:42:38 +0000

super info dottorjazz, was always only checking 47 or 43 west on the back… but never the ‘INC’

By: Rudolf

Rudolf — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:27:37 +0000

grazie dottore!

By: dottorjazz

dottorjazz — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:23:31 +0000

Lou 1591:back cover with INC.To my knowledge the first inc cover should be 4013,J McLean and the first record 4017 H Silver.
This is the way a record should’t be described unless you wanna sell reissues for originals.
Lou 1537 perfectly and totallly detailed.
That’s the way I love a record to be descibed.Useless to say we all know who the seller is…