<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Watching Jazz Vinyl Prices on The Rise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cazoon		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-255533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cazoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4283#comment-255533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe I&#039;m to anal, but any seam splits to me, means VG at best. I&#039;ll accept sligh ring wear and edge wear for VG +, but no split or tape seams .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m to anal, but any seam splits to me, means VG at best. I&#8217;ll accept sligh ring wear and edge wear for VG +, but no split or tape seams .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jud		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-255523</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4283#comment-255523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the same seller I mentioned who uses the &quot;range&quot; approach, evidently not by accident. Maybe it means it&#039;s in between the two, though he tends to always put the higher grade in the title. I did get some good records out of this guy&#039;s estate lot.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/BENNY-CARTER-and-The-Oscar-Peterson-Quartet-LP-ALONE-TOGETHER-VERVE-V-8148-VG-/290697342519?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item43aee96e37#ht_883wt_1056]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the same seller I mentioned who uses the &#8220;range&#8221; approach, evidently not by accident. Maybe it means it&#8217;s in between the two, though he tends to always put the higher grade in the title. I did get some good records out of this guy&#8217;s estate lot.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/BENNY-CARTER-and-The-Oscar-Peterson-Quartet-LP-ALONE-TOGETHER-VERVE-V-8148-VG-/290697342519?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item43aee96e37#ht_883wt_1056" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ebay.com/itm/BENNY-CARTER-and-The-Oscar-Peterson-Quartet-LP-ALONE-TOGETHER-VERVE-V-8148-VG-/290697342519?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item43aee96e37#ht_883wt_1056</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: elix		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-255440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4283#comment-255440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The sneaky mismatch between title and description has me thinking an interesting(although perhaps tedious) side project for this site might be to follow up a month or two later on some of these auctions and see what kind of feedback the buyer left. People always say the old Blue Notes play better than they look. But, while I can&#039;t afford original Blue Notes, I buy a lot of records on ebay. And I know how often I get a &quot;NM&quot; record that shows up looking absolutely trashed. It&#039;s annoying enough with a $30 record, but I sometimes wonder how many of these NM or VG++ records that sell for $1000+ show up in VG-/G condition. Even if it plays better than it looks, that&#039;s still a big difference. Anyway, I wonder how many of these records result in feedback like &quot;Smooth transaction, easy to deal with&quot; or other faint praise that sound like they could have been return/refund situations.
But that would involve combing through feedback, and would be kind of a pain in the butt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sneaky mismatch between title and description has me thinking an interesting(although perhaps tedious) side project for this site might be to follow up a month or two later on some of these auctions and see what kind of feedback the buyer left. People always say the old Blue Notes play better than they look. But, while I can&#8217;t afford original Blue Notes, I buy a lot of records on ebay. And I know how often I get a &#8220;NM&#8221; record that shows up looking absolutely trashed. It&#8217;s annoying enough with a $30 record, but I sometimes wonder how many of these NM or VG++ records that sell for $1000+ show up in VG-/G condition. Even if it plays better than it looks, that&#8217;s still a big difference. Anyway, I wonder how many of these records result in feedback like &#8220;Smooth transaction, easy to deal with&#8221; or other faint praise that sound like they could have been return/refund situations.<br />
But that would involve combing through feedback, and would be kind of a pain in the butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: picapica1974		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-255353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[picapica1974]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4283#comment-255353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A cheap Lexington KENNY BURRELL s/t RARE JAZZ LP Blue Note 1543 Mono WARHOL just $ 61.00,

http://www.ebay.com/itm/360453424167?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&#038;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2648#ht_500wt_1202
  
versus

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&#038;_trksid=p4340.l2557&#038;item=370605480647&#038;nma=true&#038;rt=nc&#038;si=Z92Zkm5WWAE5hZOX7CySlKEEChI%253D&#038;sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT&#038;orig_cvip=true&#038;rt=nc#ht_5092wt_783]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cheap Lexington KENNY BURRELL s/t RARE JAZZ LP Blue Note 1543 Mono WARHOL just $ 61.00,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/360453424167?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&#038;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2648#ht_500wt_1202" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ebay.com/itm/360453424167?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&#038;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2648#ht_500wt_1202</a></p>
<p>versus</p>
<p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&#038;_trksid=p4340.l2557&#038;item=370605480647&#038;nma=true&#038;rt=nc&#038;si=Z92Zkm5WWAE5hZOX7CySlKEEChI%253D&#038;sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT&#038;orig_cvip=true&#038;rt=nc#ht_5092wt_783" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&#038;_trksid=p4340.l2557&#038;item=370605480647&#038;nma=true&#038;rt=nc&#038;si=Z92Zkm5WWAE5hZOX7CySlKEEChI%253D&#038;sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT&#038;orig_cvip=true&#038;rt=nc#ht_5092wt_783</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jud		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/blue-note/watching-jazz-vinyl-prices-on-the-rise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-255336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4283#comment-255336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agree that it&#039;s confusing when the heading condition doesn&#039;t match the description condition.  I saw a similar tactic recently where a high grade, say VG++ would be in the headline, while the description would be a range of two conditions, as in VG+ to VG++. That&#039;s a little soft and dubious.  I know as a seller one can make mistakes by using one auction as a template for the next, maybe that&#039;s what happened here...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that it&#8217;s confusing when the heading condition doesn&#8217;t match the description condition.  I saw a similar tactic recently where a high grade, say VG++ would be in the headline, while the description would be a range of two conditions, as in VG+ to VG++. That&#8217;s a little soft and dubious.  I know as a seller one can make mistakes by using one auction as a template for the next, maybe that&#8217;s what happened here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
