<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On EBay: A Few From Impulse	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/impulse/on-ebay-a-few-from-impulse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/impulse/on-ebay-a-few-from-impulse/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Impulse collector		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/impulse/on-ebay-a-few-from-impulse/comment-page-1/#comment-44270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Impulse collector]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2323#comment-44270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have more information of Impulse original pressings? I have always emphasized at least first 32 (until Ballads) have AM-PAR written on label on 1st pressings. abc paramount Records would be then in place until 1967 or -68. Then onwards acb Records reissued all Impulse releases so far (but only in Stereo?)

Is this correct info?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have more information of Impulse original pressings? I have always emphasized at least first 32 (until Ballads) have AM-PAR written on label on 1st pressings. abc paramount Records would be then in place until 1967 or -68. Then onwards acb Records reissued all Impulse releases so far (but only in Stereo?)</p>
<p>Is this correct info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baz		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/impulse/on-ebay-a-few-from-impulse/comment-page-1/#comment-13466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2323#comment-13466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Four for Trane&#039; is probably Archie Shepp&#039;s best recording, and is due in no small way to the arrangement skills of Roswell Rudd. 

A powerful record still, 46 years after its release, and all the more interesting hearing Coltrane&#039;s tunes played by a larger ensemble. And who woulda thought a trombone solo would work on &#039;Syeeda&#039;s Song Flute&#039;?

Coltrane did it better, but Shepp, the disciple, probably played his best paying tribute to the master.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Four for Trane&#8217; is probably Archie Shepp&#8217;s best recording, and is due in no small way to the arrangement skills of Roswell Rudd. </p>
<p>A powerful record still, 46 years after its release, and all the more interesting hearing Coltrane&#8217;s tunes played by a larger ensemble. And who woulda thought a trombone solo would work on &#8216;Syeeda&#8217;s Song Flute&#8217;?</p>
<p>Coltrane did it better, but Shepp, the disciple, probably played his best paying tribute to the master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
