<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Insanity Check	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: A Classic, But Is It A Collectible? &#124; jazzcollector.com		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-379792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Classic, But Is It A Collectible? &#124; jazzcollector.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-379792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] circumstances, such as this one, clearly it can now sell for collectible prices. There was a previous copy that once sold for about $127, but the seller was bobdjukic so I&#8217;ve always assumed that was [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] circumstances, such as this one, clearly it can now sell for collectible prices. There was a previous copy that once sold for about $127, but the seller was bobdjukic so I&#8217;ve always assumed that was [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Japhy		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Japhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 01:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just because the subject of grading and condition is up for conversation again, I happened upon this copy of Zoot Sims&#039; &quot;Stretching Out&quot; on United Artists - usually a record that fetches a decent price. Yet this one ends soon and has no bids at $29.99. Curious, I took a look, and the seller gives it an unequivocal NM grade. Check that picture - you can&#039;t see anything BUT scuffs and marks all over it! Can you imagine having bid if there wasn&#039;t the picture and you receive that &quot;NM&quot; record? Some of these sellers are just plain loopy! http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stretching-Out-Zoot-Sims-Al-Cohn-United-Artist-LP-5023-Original-1959-/371233316011?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item566f3adcab]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because the subject of grading and condition is up for conversation again, I happened upon this copy of Zoot Sims&#8217; &#8220;Stretching Out&#8221; on United Artists &#8211; usually a record that fetches a decent price. Yet this one ends soon and has no bids at $29.99. Curious, I took a look, and the seller gives it an unequivocal NM grade. Check that picture &#8211; you can&#8217;t see anything BUT scuffs and marks all over it! Can you imagine having bid if there wasn&#8217;t the picture and you receive that &#8220;NM&#8221; record? Some of these sellers are just plain loopy! <a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stretching-Out-Zoot-Sims-Al-Cohn-United-Artist-LP-5023-Original-1959-/371233316011?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item566f3adcab" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stretching-Out-Zoot-Sims-Al-Cohn-United-Artist-LP-5023-Original-1959-/371233316011?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&#038;hash=item566f3adcab</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Absolutely,

I too have stated in  past posts here , that having some of these gems in even VG-VG+ condition, (depending on your point of view) is better then having nothing at all , and luckily I have some of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely,</p>
<p>I too have stated in  past posts here , that having some of these gems in even VG-VG+ condition, (depending on your point of view) is better then having nothing at all , and luckily I have some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich (DG Mono)		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich (DG Mono)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PS - The reality of it is I have quite a few records in my collection with both of the dreaded aforementioned imperfections. :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; The reality of it is I have quite a few records in my collection with both of the dreaded aforementioned imperfections. 😛</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich (DG Mono)		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich (DG Mono)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I&#039;m personally seeking some unrealistic ideal of &#039;perfection&#039;. If we really want to dissect  it, no recording ever was 100% free of noise, analog or digital. But so long as a record doesn&#039;t have those overpowering ticks or distortion from groove wear it has a place in my collection. My earlier point was simply that on occasion I may take a chance on a VG+ record but I like to ask the seller if it&#039;s been play graded and if they have any comment regarding the *significant* imperfections mentioned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m personally seeking some unrealistic ideal of &#8216;perfection&#8217;. If we really want to dissect  it, no recording ever was 100% free of noise, analog or digital. But so long as a record doesn&#8217;t have those overpowering ticks or distortion from groove wear it has a place in my collection. My earlier point was simply that on occasion I may take a chance on a VG+ record but I like to ask the seller if it&#8217;s been play graded and if they have any comment regarding the *significant* imperfections mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[/\ /\ /\
That.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/\ /\ /\<br />
That.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359054</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[May wanna get a new hobby if you cant deal with imperfection]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May wanna get a new hobby if you cant deal with imperfection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Opps sorry, I should add that I know that even if there was a 3rd party grading system for records the conversation would still continue. As someone who has been in the Comic Book market in the past, and even though there is CGC and PGX to smooth things out not everyone agrees on their grading. It just seems to be more readily excepted in that area of collecting. The problem with grading as a whole is it’s too subjective and open to interpretation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps sorry, I should add that I know that even if there was a 3rd party grading system for records the conversation would still continue. As someone who has been in the Comic Book market in the past, and even though there is CGC and PGX to smooth things out not everyone agrees on their grading. It just seems to be more readily excepted in that area of collecting. The problem with grading as a whole is it’s too subjective and open to interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-359024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-359024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ahhhhh the timeless discussion about record grading.

I mentioned in a previous post about CGC and 3rd party grading system. That could possibly  be the answer , if not,  the conversation will continue on Bad/Good grading of records forever.

But my two cents is that I agree with the play test. I have a few Beautiful Mint jazz records  by appearance and when you throw them on there is varying degrees of noise due to , Oh so many reasons but none the less it is there.
Example, I have a Dead Mint copy of Miles Davis and Milt Jackson Quintet Prestige 7034. (By sight) Yet  there is still a bit of surface noise, not at all bad but it&#039;s there. If I never played it , I too would call this NM.
Playing this right now. Another Milt Jackson LP I like.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhhh the timeless discussion about record grading.</p>
<p>I mentioned in a previous post about CGC and 3rd party grading system. That could possibly  be the answer , if not,  the conversation will continue on Bad/Good grading of records forever.</p>
<p>But my two cents is that I agree with the play test. I have a few Beautiful Mint jazz records  by appearance and when you throw them on there is varying degrees of noise due to , Oh so many reasons but none the less it is there.<br />
Example, I have a Dead Mint copy of Miles Davis and Milt Jackson Quintet Prestige 7034. (By sight) Yet  there is still a bit of surface noise, not at all bad but it&#8217;s there. If I never played it , I too would call this NM.<br />
Playing this right now. Another Milt Jackson LP I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/jazz-vinyl/insanity-check/comment-page-1/#comment-358982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=6290#comment-358982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Almost nobody can grade a record properly in my experience. Caveat emptor. The question is, can you deal with imperfections?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost nobody can grade a record properly in my experience. Caveat emptor. The question is, can you deal with imperfections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
