<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Giant Steps, Black Label, No DG?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-383665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-383665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have an opinion on when the changeover occurred from the non-DG black label to the fanwheel label?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have an opinion on when the changeover occurred from the non-DG black label to the fanwheel label?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-369885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-369885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a non-deep groove black label mono that has been well taken care of and if i close my eyes it sounds like I&#039;m in the room at the session. My question has to do with a marking on the back side of the lp. In the bottom right corner of the back side there is a &quot;B7&quot; stamped in figures about 3/8th of an inch high. I do not know if this was a code or what but it looks to have been added during the manufacturing process. Anyone have an idea as to the significance of such a stamp?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a non-deep groove black label mono that has been well taken care of and if i close my eyes it sounds like I&#8217;m in the room at the session. My question has to do with a marking on the back side of the lp. In the bottom right corner of the back side there is a &#8220;B7&#8221; stamped in figures about 3/8th of an inch high. I do not know if this was a code or what but it looks to have been added during the manufacturing process. Anyone have an idea as to the significance of such a stamp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-329444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-329444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just scored a non deep groove black label.  Its really clean.  I guess I will spin it tonight to see how it sounds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just scored a non deep groove black label.  Its really clean.  I guess I will spin it tonight to see how it sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-237103</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-237103</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rudolf,
One problem with going by the catalog number for label designs is that albums weren&#039;t always released sequentially.  For example the first stereo pressing of 1311 (Giant Steps) was the &quot;bullseye&quot; label while the first stereo pressing of 1325 (Pyramid) was on the green label, both monos of course being on the black label.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudolf,<br />
One problem with going by the catalog number for label designs is that albums weren&#8217;t always released sequentially.  For example the first stereo pressing of 1311 (Giant Steps) was the &#8220;bullseye&#8221; label while the first stereo pressing of 1325 (Pyramid) was on the green label, both monos of course being on the black label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rudolf		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-236814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-236814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chris, that is very interesting and essential information, thank you. Have you any further info on Atlantic, until what catalogue number the black DG label first issue, resp. green stereo label, ditto for bull&#039;s eye etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, that is very interesting and essential information, thank you. Have you any further info on Atlantic, until what catalogue number the black DG label first issue, resp. green stereo label, ditto for bull&#8217;s eye etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-236742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-236742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They are both first pressings.They were just pressed at different plants.One plant still used the old machines with the DG, and another used a newer press with the non DG.
The non DG is more rare and better quality then the DG press.You will see about 20-1 DG to Non DG.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are both first pressings.They were just pressed at different plants.One plant still used the old machines with the DG, and another used a newer press with the non DG.<br />
The non DG is more rare and better quality then the DG press.You will see about 20-1 DG to Non DG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-14079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-14079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jack,
Do both the deep groove and non-deep groove copies you have share the same deadwax etchings?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,<br />
Do both the deep groove and non-deep groove copies you have share the same deadwax etchings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jack		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-13882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-13882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have both a deep groove and a non deep groove pressing of this with black label.  which came first I don&#039;t know.  I like the sound of the non deep groove version better though they both sound similar.  Both are far superior to the 2nd bullseye pressing and later ones.   I wasn&#039;t particularly fond of this lp til I got my hands on a first pressing.  Its great!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both a deep groove and a non deep groove pressing of this with black label.  which came first I don&#8217;t know.  I like the sound of the non deep groove version better though they both sound similar.  Both are far superior to the 2nd bullseye pressing and later ones.   I wasn&#8217;t particularly fond of this lp til I got my hands on a first pressing.  Its great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rudolf		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-13793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-13793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[then, I would say, you have an original copy, unless it is a perfect reproduction. One never knows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then, I would say, you have an original copy, unless it is a perfect reproduction. One never knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joaquim		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/questions/giant-steps-black-label-no-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-13788</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joaquim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=2586#comment-13788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Rudolf. ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION 157 WEST 57 STREET NEW YORK 19, NEW YORK]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rudolf. ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION 157 WEST 57 STREET NEW YORK 19, NEW YORK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
