<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Monk&#8217;s Music: The $3,000 Question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/monks-music-the-3000-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/monks-music-the-3000-question/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: All Things Considered, Some Surprising Prices &#124; jazzcollector.com		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/monks-music-the-3000-question/comment-page-1/#comment-8296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[All Things Considered, Some Surprising Prices &#124; jazzcollector.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=297#comment-8296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] copy sold for more than $3,000. We chronicled it on Jazz Collector and it created quite a stir. See here.  In any case that price for a mono was an aberration, just as we feel the price here for a stereo is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] copy sold for more than $3,000. We chronicled it on Jazz Collector and it created quite a stir. See here.  In any case that price for a mono was an aberration, just as we feel the price here for a stereo is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jazzcollector.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Today on EBAY, Nov. 26, 2008		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/monks-music-the-3000-question/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jazzcollector.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Today on EBAY, Nov. 26, 2008]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=297#comment-598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] than $3,000. You can find the original article by doing a search on the site or just by clicking here.  This one will not sell for $3,000, of that we can be sure. It is in VG+ condition and is currently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] than $3,000. You can find the original article by doing a search on the site or just by clicking here.  This one will not sell for $3,000, of that we can be sure. It is in VG+ condition and is currently [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jazzcollector.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monk&#8217;s Music, Again, But Not For $3,000		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/monks-music-the-3000-question/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jazzcollector.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monk&#8217;s Music, Again, But Not For $3,000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=297#comment-231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] one because it is an album that once &#8212; one-time-only &#8212; actually sold for more than $3,000 on eBay, three-plus years ago. At the time there was considerable discussion and consternation about it, since this had usually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one because it is an album that once &#8212; one-time-only &#8212; actually sold for more than $3,000 on eBay, three-plus years ago. At the time there was considerable discussion and consternation about it, since this had usually [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
