<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It&#8217;s A Seal, But is it a Steal?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/</link>
	<description>For those who love jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter A		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many sessions recorded for Riverside were fantastic (musicwise) but often not so well recorded (no RVG here) and pressings were often lousy too. Same with Atlantic: many fantastic sessions but often poorly recorded...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many sessions recorded for Riverside were fantastic (musicwise) but often not so well recorded (no RVG here) and pressings were often lousy too. Same with Atlantic: many fantastic sessions but often poorly recorded&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267562</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Anyone buying such a pricey record should be aware that many of the later riverides are noisy due to the inferior quality of the vinyl.&quot;

It&#039;s not just the later ones, I&#039;ve had a few original Riversides that were pressed on noisy vinyl.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone buying such a pricey record should be aware that many of the later riverides are noisy due to the inferior quality of the vinyl.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the later ones, I&#8217;ve had a few original Riversides that were pressed on noisy vinyl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michel		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are two generations of Deep Groove reel mike label of this  Waltsz For Debby album. . The original has a large label with a wide DG. The cover must have same lettering on top right as the one featured in the auction. (the sealed one). The other DG edition has a narrower DG and large black lettering on top back RS 9399 on left and RLP 399 on right. 

Anyone buying such a pricey record should be aware that many of the later riverides are noisy due to the inferior quality of the vinyl...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two generations of Deep Groove reel mike label of this  Waltsz For Debby album. . The original has a large label with a wide DG. The cover must have same lettering on top right as the one featured in the auction. (the sealed one). The other DG edition has a narrower DG and large black lettering on top back RS 9399 on left and RLP 399 on right. </p>
<p>Anyone buying such a pricey record should be aware that many of the later riverides are noisy due to the inferior quality of the vinyl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;Inc.&quot; on the bottom line of the label text first appeared  in 1960.  Accoring to what I&#039;ve read this started on release number 329 and went to 476 (except 331, 332, 333 &#038; 339).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Inc.&#8221; on the bottom line of the label text first appeared  in 1960.  Accoring to what I&#8217;ve read this started on release number 329 and went to 476 (except 331, 332, 333 &amp; 339).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ceedee		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ceedee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RE:&quot;Waltz&quot; and the other early Evans/Lafaro/Motian trio recordings on Riverside-can someone please clarify the &quot;Bill Grauer,Inc.&quot; issue? Are only the first year issues w/o the &quot;INC.&quot; and thus a first &quot;original&quot; pressing? When did the &quot;Inc.&quot; become a part of the Riverside label? Both editions sound great to me,but if someone is paying that kind of bread,they should have all the info available,right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE:&#8221;Waltz&#8221; and the other early Evans/Lafaro/Motian trio recordings on Riverside-can someone please clarify the &#8220;Bill Grauer,Inc.&#8221; issue? Are only the first year issues w/o the &#8220;INC.&#8221; and thus a first &#8220;original&#8221; pressing? When did the &#8220;Inc.&#8221; become a part of the Riverside label? Both editions sound great to me,but if someone is paying that kind of bread,they should have all the info available,right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike F		</title>
		<link>https://jazzcollector.com/riverside/signed-sealed-and-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-267539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcollector.com/?p=4608#comment-267539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My Blue Label Orpheum Mono Orpheum pressing(not original obviously) has the same features on the cover as this one.  I don&#039;t have an original to compare it to, but looking at the cover I can&#039;t tell a difference, clearly the label is different but you can&#039;t find this out without opening.  All features(that I can see from the photos) are identical on my Orpheum which would make me nervous if I was a bidder here.  

I&#039;m not opposed to paying big bucks for a premium copy of a record and IF this is original it&#039;s seems that it&#039;s about as premium as it gets.  If this was one of my must have records I might bid and take the risk but honestly I&#039;m not a huge Bill Evans fan(like and appreciate but I don&#039;t LOVE him) so I&#039;m not in on this one.  I hope whoever gets it finds an original but there is a possibility it&#039;s a mid-60s Orpheum.  If any bidder has any questions about my copy please feel free, I just wish I had an original to compare and do a more thorough investigation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Blue Label Orpheum Mono Orpheum pressing(not original obviously) has the same features on the cover as this one.  I don&#8217;t have an original to compare it to, but looking at the cover I can&#8217;t tell a difference, clearly the label is different but you can&#8217;t find this out without opening.  All features(that I can see from the photos) are identical on my Orpheum which would make me nervous if I was a bidder here.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not opposed to paying big bucks for a premium copy of a record and IF this is original it&#8217;s seems that it&#8217;s about as premium as it gets.  If this was one of my must have records I might bid and take the risk but honestly I&#8217;m not a huge Bill Evans fan(like and appreciate but I don&#8217;t LOVE him) so I&#8217;m not in on this one.  I hope whoever gets it finds an original but there is a possibility it&#8217;s a mid-60s Orpheum.  If any bidder has any questions about my copy please feel free, I just wish I had an original to compare and do a more thorough investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
