10 comments

  • …Damn !!! If anyone is interested, I’ve got a copy without all the seam splits that I would let go for $6000 ! (heh heh heh) Perhaps they meant to post it for $75.00 and forgot the decimal, as it really doesn’t look like they put much effort into their posting to begin with. Let this be a lesson for all you aspiring “Nautiluso’s” out there… For $7,500 I would expect a bit more flair, a convincing sales pitch and some decent photos at very least ! Where is the love ? This used to be about the music !!!

  • …but is it (original) though? Aren’t there supposed to be copies without the ‘Inc’ & ‘R’?

  • I don’t think so. I bought mine when it was issued in 1959. It has Inc and R. The highest catalogue number I have without Inc and R is 4006.

  • Well, I think Don-Lucky is right about this one and the missing decimal point.

  • Good way to get your auction noticed!

  • Yes, but quite expensive as well.

  • perhaps you missed that the seller has actually changed the start price to $75.00?

  • Yeah,he did change it..hopefully before inspiring any other novice seller to reach for such “ass-tronomical” heights.

  • Maybe all publicity isn’t good publicity after all – no bidders for this guy; …and even $75 is a bit steep as a starting price for this title – the last few on ebay (in similar condition, recorded by popsike) ended for quite a bit less than that.

    Did you mean 4016 Rudolf? There are certainly copies of 4006 (Dizzy Reece) without Inc & R. (& 4007 to 4016).

  • No, I meant to say that the last original in my collecton, without Inc and R, is # 4006. My 4017 is definitely an original first, so between 4006 and 4016 they made the change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *